Bangalore,
The Hindu, May 4, 2014
The Hindu, May 4, 2014
Calling for “reconciliation” between the two fairly
divergent and much-debated reports on the Western Ghats — the first by a
panel headed by ecologist Madhav Gadgil and second by a committee led
by Planning Commission member K. Kasturirangan — scientist R. Sukumar
has said another round of consultations should pave the way to resolving
the issue.
Talk held
Neither
report had been accepted by Karnataka or Kerala, he said while speaking
on ‘Western Ghats: confusion over conservation?’ here on Saturday.
Prof.
Sukumar, who is a member of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel
headed by Prof. Gadgil, said that a fresh round of consultations “is the
responsibility” of the Union and State governments. The talk was
organised by the Indian Institute of Public Administration (Karnataka
regional branch).
The Kasturirangan committee could
have “refined” or “modified” the Gadgil report but instead “threw out
our report and came up with an entirely new one”.
The
major difference in the two reports was on the extent of ecologically
sensitive area (ESA) that each recommended, Prof. Sukumar said.
While
the Gadgil report sees the entire Western Ghats as ESA (under three
levels of protection), the Kasturirangan report suggests 37 per cent of
the total area be brought under ESA.
0 comments:
Post a Comment