Shekar Dattatri, Praveen Bhargav
The Hindu, October 30, 2015
Thousands of grand old trees flanked most of our highways ten to 15
years ago, but succumbed to the axe when two-lane highways were upgraded
to four-lane or six-lane ones. Now, in a bid to bring back lost green
cover, the government has announced a ‘Green Highways Policy’, with the
stated objective of developing “eco friendly National Highways.”
Bypasses are commonly resorted to for circumventing cities and towns. So
it is logical to extend the concept to forest areas. If we are willing
to think afresh on urban development by way of designing ‘Smart Cities’,
why not ‘Smart Highways’ that will traverse the country with the least
disturbance to our last remaining natural habitats? In the past, when
the concept of land use planning was still nascent, highways
metamorphosed from roads that were once footpaths or cart tracks. But
the smart highways of tomorrow need not follow such alignments. By
making use of all the sophisticated mapping technology at our disposal
today, it is possible to ensure that roads steer clear of wildlife
areas. The extra cost or effort in creating a few detours is a small
price to pay for safeguarding our priceless wildlife heritage, and must
be built into the budgets of road projects. Unfortunately, so far, the
government has shown an unseemly reluctance to address the issue of
highway stretches passing through forests, and has only deigned to even
discuss it in instances where there has been enormous public pressure,
or when a case has been filed.
The Hindu, October 30, 2015
Shekar Dattatri
Praveen Bhargav
Dismayingly, however, the policy is silent on a critical issue — that of
highway stretches passing through forests, particularly, our
sanctuaries and national parks. Speeding vehicles plying on these roads
cause the deaths of thousands of animals, large and small, every year.
Many of the casualties are highly endangered species, which the same
government spends much money and effort to conserve.
The fact is, in this era of high-speed vehicles, any road through a
natural habitat poses a grave danger to animals trying to get across
from one side to the other. Four or six-lane highways, with a median in
between, present an almost insurmountable barrier for wildlife,
particularly, animals with cubs or calves. A study in 2010 reported that
1,035 roadkills of wildlife were recorded in 430 days on a 9.2 km
stretch of the Nagpur-Jabalpur Highway (NH 7) that passes through the
Pench Tiger Reserve. So, even just from a compassionate viewpoint, it
behoves us as a civilised nation to take all steps necessary to minimise
the impact of roads on wildlife.
However, there is also an ecological imperative. Highway stretches
passing through forests cause severe fragmentation of habitats. This
disruption of ecological connectivity curtails or restricts gene flow
that is crucial for sustaining healthy wildlife populations and
ecosystems. Additionally, highways create new edges that are highly
vulnerable to fire and incursion by pernicious weeds, attract ancillary
developmental activities, and provide easy access to the forest for
poachers and timber smugglers.
Bypassing forests
In recognition of the extremely deleterious impacts that roads have on forests and wildlife, a sub-committee constituted in June 2013 by the National Board for Wildlife reiterated the recommendation contained in the National Wildlife Action Plan 2002-2016 (NWAP) released by the then Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The NWAP is emphatic that the Ministry of Surface Transport must plan roads, highways and expressways in such a manner that all national parks and sanctuaries are bypassed and wildlife corridors avoided.
In recognition of the extremely deleterious impacts that roads have on forests and wildlife, a sub-committee constituted in June 2013 by the National Board for Wildlife reiterated the recommendation contained in the National Wildlife Action Plan 2002-2016 (NWAP) released by the then Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The NWAP is emphatic that the Ministry of Surface Transport must plan roads, highways and expressways in such a manner that all national parks and sanctuaries are bypassed and wildlife corridors avoided.
“Highway stretches passing through forests cause severe fragmentation of habitats.”
As for existing highways through forests, particularly those for which
bypasses are absolutely not feasible, we need to retrofit them with
state-of-the-art, science-based solutions for minimising roadkills.
Carefully conceived underpasses, overpasses, flyovers and canopy
bridges, which take animal behaviour and traditional wildlife movement
patterns into consideration, can help provide a safe passage for
animals. In this context, policymakers ought to have studied successful
examples from around the world, including the exemplary work done on the
Trans-Canada Highway passing through Banff National Park, where an 80
per cent reduction in large mammal deaths has reportedly been achieved,
thanks to an extensive system of wildlife underpasses and overpasses.
Given that India intends to add thousands of kilometres of new highways
in the coming years, it is disappointing that the Green Highways Policy
does not even touch on this issue.
“With many developed countries having already shown the way, we have no excuse to lag behind.”
Supreme Court caution
It is relevant to recall a significant observation made by the Supreme Court in another conservation-related matter. In a judgment delivered on February 13, 2012, the apex court held that our approach to development should be eco-centric, rather than focussing only on what is good for humans. We humans, the judgment observes, have obligations to the non-human inhabitants of the earth. Perhaps it is also sensible to remind ourselves, from time to time, that it these very non-human inhabitants that make the earth habitable, and that nature is the very foundation for our ecological security.
It is relevant to recall a significant observation made by the Supreme Court in another conservation-related matter. In a judgment delivered on February 13, 2012, the apex court held that our approach to development should be eco-centric, rather than focussing only on what is good for humans. We humans, the judgment observes, have obligations to the non-human inhabitants of the earth. Perhaps it is also sensible to remind ourselves, from time to time, that it these very non-human inhabitants that make the earth habitable, and that nature is the very foundation for our ecological security.
While no one questions the need for modern highways in order to achieve
the economic growth we aspire for as a nation, to build them with scant
regard for the enormous collateral damage to wildlife is shortsighted
and callous.
With many developed countries having already shown the way, we have no
excuse to lag behind. Indeed, as the land of the Buddha, Mahavira and
Mahatma Gandhi, the three greatest proponents of ahimsa, we have an even
greater moral imperative to do right by our wildlife.
It’s time to walk the talk, not only by heeding the values enshrined in
our Constitution and cultural ethos, but also by incorporating the best
practices of eco-centric highways. Planting trees by the roadside is
very welcome, but to be truly green or eco friendly, the new highways
policy has to do much more.
(Shekar Dattatri and Praveen Bhargav are former members of the National Board for Wildlife).